A separate opinion may be written by one or more judges to concur with or dissent from the majority. This statement describes what?

A separate opinion may be written by one or more judges to concur with or dissent from the majority. This statement describes what?

• A. A concurring opinion only.
• B. An advisory opinion.
• C. A separate opinion.
• D. An amicus brief.

Answer: (C)

A separate opinion is an opinion written by a judge apart from the majority, used to express a different view or reasoning. It covers two possibilities: a concurrence, where the judge agrees with the outcome but not the reasoning, and a dissent, where the judge disagrees with the outcome. The statement points to this broader idea because it notes that a separate opinion may concur with or dissent from the majority, which is exactly what a separate opinion encompasses. The other terms don’t fit: an advisory opinion is non-binding guidance issued in non-contested matters, and an amicus brief is a document from a non-party offering information, not a judge’s own opinion in the case.

A separate opinion is an opinion written by a judge apart from the majority, used to express a different view or reasoning. It covers two possibilities: a concurrence, where the judge agrees with the outcome but not the reasoning, and a dissent, where the judge disagrees with the outcome. The statement points to this broader idea because it notes that a separate opinion may concur with or dissent from the majority, which is exactly what a separate opinion encompasses. The other terms don’t fit: an advisory opinion is non-binding guidance issued in non-contested matters, and an amicus brief is a document from a non-party offering information, not a judge’s own opinion in the case.