Challenge for Cause is

Challenge for Cause is

• A. An objection to a particular juror during jury selection that requires a legal reason to be shown.
• B. An automatic strike that may be used on any juror.
• C. A challenge to the court's authority during trial.
• D. A motion to dismiss the case due to time limits.

Answer: (A)

Challenge for cause is a mechanism used during jury selection to remove a potential juror because there is a legal reason they cannot be impartial. An attorney must show a valid basis—such as actual or apparent bias, a relationship to a party, or knowledge of the case—that would prevent fair deliberation. The judge decides whether to sustain the challenge and, if so, the juror is excused from the panel. This is different from a peremptory challenge, which allows striking a juror without giving a reason (though still subject to certain limits). It’s also not about challenging the court’s authority during trial or about dismissing the case for time limits.

Challenge for cause is a mechanism used during jury selection to remove a potential juror because there is a legal reason they cannot be impartial. An attorney must show a valid basis—such as actual or apparent bias, a relationship to a party, or knowledge of the case—that would prevent fair deliberation. The judge decides whether to sustain the challenge and, if so, the juror is excused from the panel. This is different from a peremptory challenge, which allows striking a juror without giving a reason (though still subject to certain limits). It’s also not about challenging the court’s authority during trial or about dismissing the case for time limits.