Judicial immunity covers only judicial acts, not ministerial duties of the clerk. (Reaffirming the concept)

Judicial immunity covers only judicial acts, not ministerial duties of the clerk. (Reaffirming the concept)

• A. True
• B. False
• C. It covers both
• D. It covers neither

Answer: (A)

Judicial immunity protects a judge from civil liability for acts performed in the judge’s official judicial role. It does not extend to the clerk’s administrative tasks or ministerial duties. Clerks handle things like filing, docketing, and processing paperwork to support the court, and those actions can be subject to liability if done negligently or beyond authority. The purpose of the immunity is to keep the judge free to decide disputes without fear of personal liability for their judicial decisions, while clerical errors or misconduct fall outside that protection. So the statement is true: immunity covers judicial acts, not the clerk’s ministerial duties.

Judicial immunity protects a judge from civil liability for acts performed in the judge’s official judicial role. It does not extend to the clerk’s administrative tasks or ministerial duties. Clerks handle things like filing, docketing, and processing paperwork to support the court, and those actions can be subject to liability if done negligently or beyond authority. The purpose of the immunity is to keep the judge free to decide disputes without fear of personal liability for their judicial decisions, while clerical errors or misconduct fall outside that protection. So the statement is true: immunity covers judicial acts, not the clerk’s ministerial duties.