The clerk may never grant a postponement of jury service.

The clerk may never grant a postponement of jury service.

• A. False
• B. True
• C. Only for municipal juries
• D. Only for grand juries

Answer: (A)

The ability to manage when people serve on juries includes granting postponements. A clerk can defer a juror’s service to a later date when there’s a legitimate conflict or hardship and the court’s rules allow it. This keeps juror pools balanced and the court calendar workable, instead of forcing someone to serve at an impossible time. Usually the deferral is for a specific, workable date—either later in the same term or in a future term—rather than an outright denial of service. Often, if the postponement isn’t enough or if there are more serious reasons, the judge may still review and decide on excusal or a different arrangement. But the key point is that clerks do have authority to grant postponements, so the statement that they may never do so isn’t correct.

The ability to manage when people serve on juries includes granting postponements. A clerk can defer a juror’s service to a later date when there’s a legitimate conflict or hardship and the court’s rules allow it. This keeps juror pools balanced and the court calendar workable, instead of forcing someone to serve at an impossible time. Usually the deferral is for a specific, workable date—either later in the same term or in a future term—rather than an outright denial of service.

Often, if the postponement isn’t enough or if there are more serious reasons, the judge may still review and decide on excusal or a different arrangement. But the key point is that clerks do have authority to grant postponements, so the statement that they may never do so isn’t correct.