Which statement best describes Attorney General Opinions?

Which statement best describes Attorney General Opinions?

• A. The opinions are not binding on the courts, but they are usually considered persuasive.
• B. They are binding on the courts.
• C. They are statutes enacted by the Legislature.
• D. They are appellate court decisions.

Answer: (A)

Attorney General Opinions are advisory interpretations issued by the state’s Attorney General in response to questions about how laws should be applied. They do not have the force of law because they are not statutes. Courts are not bound to follow them, but they carry persuasive authority and are often cited by judges, prosecutors, and agencies to guide how a statute or constitutional provision should be read. They can help clarify ambiguities and inform enforcement decisions, yet a court may reject an opinion if the governing statutes or case law point to a different interpretation. They are not binding on the courts, they are not statutes enacted by the Legislature, and they are not appellate court decisions.

Attorney General Opinions are advisory interpretations issued by the state’s Attorney General in response to questions about how laws should be applied. They do not have the force of law because they are not statutes. Courts are not bound to follow them, but they carry persuasive authority and are often cited by judges, prosecutors, and agencies to guide how a statute or constitutional provision should be read. They can help clarify ambiguities and inform enforcement decisions, yet a court may reject an opinion if the governing statutes or case law point to a different interpretation. They are not binding on the courts, they are not statutes enacted by the Legislature, and they are not appellate court decisions.