Which term describes a concise holding by the entire court with an unidentified author?

Which term describes a concise holding by the entire court with an unidentified author?

• A. Memorandum opinion
• B. Dissenting opinion
• C. Per curiam opinion
• D. Out-Card

Answer: (C)

Per curiam opinions are decisions issued by the court as a whole, without naming a specific author. They’re typically concise and focus on the holding, with no individual judge signed to the opinion. This fits the idea of a concise holding by the entire court with an unidentified author. Memorandum opinions can be brief and unsigned but aren’t necessarily by the whole court. A dissenting opinion is written by a judge who disagrees with the majority and is signed. The term Out-Card isn’t a standard designation. So, the term that best matches a concise holding by the entire court with an unidentified author is per curiam.

Per curiam opinions are decisions issued by the court as a whole, without naming a specific author. They’re typically concise and focus on the holding, with no individual judge signed to the opinion. This fits the idea of a concise holding by the entire court with an unidentified author. Memorandum opinions can be brief and unsigned but aren’t necessarily by the whole court. A dissenting opinion is written by a judge who disagrees with the majority and is signed. The term Out-Card isn’t a standard designation. So, the term that best matches a concise holding by the entire court with an unidentified author is per curiam.